Of course the saying doesn't say that what for a long time appears to be an opportunity to achieve sainthood turns out to have been a temptation that led on the road to perdition.
Tsk. Clearly, your inner boy has not been properly exposed to the decadence that is marshmallow fluff. I'll admit that I'm not a huge fan of it, coming from a Fluff-less family, but many of my friends did and a Fluffernutter is something to be tried at least once.
The saltiness of the peanut butter offsets the fluff. I can't tolerate even jelly without something to modulate the sweetness.
Amongst other things, "General". The rest of them were a variation on my given name, with added suffixes for diminutive (i.e., Gingele). My partner nicknamed me "Bear", for reasons of her own. ;-)
Yes, it does. It was bestowed upon me more for my personality, at a young age, than for mere alliteration. I was once, and you'll find this hard to believe, rather argumentative.
Ah, yes. It's an anti-inflammatory agent used for gout and pseudo-gout (and one or two other uncommon inflammatory conditions). It's got a lot of unwanted effects, so patients have to be careful using it. However, it does work well for gout.
Getting old is no fun..but I think I've referred to my Dad's saying before.
My parents, my partner and I were sitting down to dinner one night, and we were discussing the various medications, lifestyle changes, and doctoral appointments that we were subjecting ourselves. My mom then commented that we were all getting to the age where all we talked about were medications, problems, doctors, etc. I had a point to all this, but was interrupted by a phone call, so now I am wandering aimlessly through this comment.
BTW, I've been seeing adverts for a nail file for pets and I'm wondering how much of a gimmick it is (the question is purely academic since we have no pets)?
The nail file is probably a minor gimmick -- you can buy a diamond file for fairly cheaply in the drugstores. It's most useful for small critters (small dogs, birds, "pocket pets", etc.) For a larger dog or for a cat, you're better off with some form of clipper.
If it isn't diamond-coated, then it's pure gimmick and not worth any time at all. ;-)
LOL..I suppose someone is referencing the "natural" action of hard surfaces (i.e., sidewalks and roads) on the nails. Dogs who spend time on hard surfaces do indeed "file" the nails "naturally". There's nothing wrong with clipping, though.
I'm not surprised they're aiming at "pet parents", as most households in the US have at least one pet now, and often more than one. With more people having disposable income, and the tendency of folks to include their pets as "family" (myself included..*), there's a strong drive to spend money on Fido and Fluffy. Other species are growing as well, and horses are making a comeback as "backyard pleasure equine" instead of as working animals. We've got more and more overweight pets, too.
While I'm a cat person, we're not likely to have a pet, or companion animal in the house as long as my mother-in-law is alive (long may she flourish). And we don'thave a big enough backyard for a dog, nor, for that matter for a horse. Did see a Shetland pony the other day at the Arts Center, though.
no subject
Date: Aug. 3rd, 2008 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 3rd, 2008 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 3rd, 2008 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 3rd, 2008 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 02:25 am (UTC)Dang. Now I'm hungry.
no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 03:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 5th, 2008 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 5th, 2008 06:05 pm (UTC)Urp.
I'm going to be sick.
no subject
Date: Aug. 5th, 2008 07:29 pm (UTC)The saltiness of the peanut butter offsets the fluff. I can't tolerate even jelly without something to modulate the sweetness.
no subject
Date: Aug. 5th, 2008 10:57 pm (UTC)Somehow I thought your nickname as a child was Fluffy.
no subject
Date: Aug. 6th, 2008 04:37 pm (UTC)Oscar, maybe.
no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 06:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 07:15 pm (UTC)No, really.
no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 07:19 pm (UTC)"Yes, you do."
No I don't.
"Do too."
no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 4th, 2008 01:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 5th, 2008 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 5th, 2008 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 06:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 08:53 pm (UTC)My parents, my partner and I were sitting down to dinner one night, and we were discussing the various medications, lifestyle changes, and doctoral appointments that we were subjecting ourselves. My mom then commented that we were all getting to the age where all we talked about were medications, problems, doctors, etc. I had a point to all this, but was interrupted by a phone call, so now I am wandering aimlessly through this comment.
I'll just stop here and get off the bus.
no subject
Date: Aug. 11th, 2008 09:11 pm (UTC)BTW, I've been seeing adverts for a nail file for pets and I'm wondering how much of a gimmick it is (the question is purely academic since we have no pets)?
no subject
Date: Aug. 12th, 2008 01:01 pm (UTC)The nail file is probably a minor gimmick -- you can buy a diamond file for fairly cheaply in the drugstores. It's most useful for small critters (small dogs, birds, "pocket pets", etc.) For a larger dog or for a cat, you're better off with some form of clipper.
If it isn't diamond-coated, then it's pure gimmick and not worth any time at all. ;-)
no subject
Date: Aug. 12th, 2008 02:52 pm (UTC)It looked like a gimmick to me, but I thought I'd ask a professional. And it was aimed at dog and cat owners ('pet parents' in the advert).
no subject
Date: Aug. 12th, 2008 04:38 pm (UTC)I'm not surprised they're aiming at "pet parents", as most households in the US have at least one pet now, and often more than one. With more people having disposable income, and the tendency of folks to include their pets as "family" (myself included..*), there's a strong drive to spend money on Fido and Fluffy. Other species are growing as well, and horses are making a comeback as "backyard pleasure equine" instead of as working animals. We've got more and more overweight pets, too.
*Only, I get a professional discount. ;-)
no subject
Date: Aug. 12th, 2008 04:45 pm (UTC)While I'm a cat person, we're not likely to have a pet, or companion animal in the house as long as my mother-in-law is alive (long may she flourish). And we don'thave a big enough backyard for a dog, nor, for that matter for a horse. Did see a Shetland pony the other day at the Arts Center, though.