In case you're wondering why yesterday's entry referred to verbose posts, that was in reaction to this:
http://kathryn-ironic.livejournal.com/11936.html
Apparently, there's some site meter that considers Kathryn's posts too verbose because she uses too many sentences. How silly. Her posts are the length they need to be. So are mine(*), although my wife says they're too short for people to find anything to respond to, but I prefer to think of them as information-dense(**).
----------
(*) Hey, you over there! Don't think I didn't hear that snicker!
(**) I heard that one too!
http://kathryn-ironic.livejournal.com/11936.html
Apparently, there's some site meter that considers Kathryn's posts too verbose because she uses too many sentences. How silly. Her posts are the length they need to be. So are mine(*), although my wife says they're too short for people to find anything to respond to, but I prefer to think of them as information-dense(**).
----------
(*) Hey, you over there! Don't think I didn't hear that snicker!
(**) I heard that one too!
no subject
Date: Aug. 22nd, 2007 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 22nd, 2007 10:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 22nd, 2007 11:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 22nd, 2007 03:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 22nd, 2007 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 23rd, 2007 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Aug. 24th, 2007 01:04 pm (UTC)(C'mon. You know you wanted me to say it.)